Is each recommended action (what to do) stated specifically and unambiguously? That is, would members of the intended audience execute each action in a consistent way? If not, rewrite the action.
Recommended Action
Under what conditions will be performed?
Under What Conditions
Would the guideline's intended audience consistently determine whether each condition has been satisfied? If not, rewrite the condition.
Condition
What are the intended benefits of
IF
What are the anticipated Risks, Harms, and Costs of
IF
Is there Equilibrium or a preponderance of Benefits or Risks, Harms, and Costs?
Equilibrium
Preponderance of Risks, Harms, and Costs
Preponderance of Benefits
Benefits
Risks, Harms, Costs
What aggregate evidence quality supports these benefits, risks, harms, and costs?
IF
With a Level Evidence Quality Rating and this key action statement should have a Recommendation Strength of
The level of obligation should be